HELPING THE OTHERS REALIZE THE ADVANTAGES OF H4831 VS H4831SC

Helping The others Realize The Advantages Of h4831 vs h4831sc

Helping The others Realize The Advantages Of h4831 vs h4831sc

Blog Article

Given that there would not look like any "Formal" Load Data on the market for this Load, can many of you offer a starting point with this combination and points to consider when Operating this Load up?

I've applied H4831 (and H4831SC), And that i use it. There are not several cartridges that I utilize it for as I look always to gravitate to other powders. On the other hand, I can't express that it does not do the job. It is just that Several other powders function far better for just a provided cartridge. For instance, while in the 280, H4831 gave me good velocity and very good groups with Nosler a hundred and forty AB. Nevertheless, RL19 was marginally greater in precision, while the velocity was practically similar.

This has become the largest causes reloaders are admonished to work with new data only; and to start out lower anytime you obtain a completely new great deal of powder. You don't truly know (unless the company tells you so) that the new wide range of powder was even produced at exactly the same factory given that the powder you purchased a several years in the past.

Warning making use of SC or SSC made loads with extended Slash, back again off and do the job up. Use Secure loading approaches.

Thornton, CO Source of H4831SC is beginning to dwindle down as well so get what you may need on your new load I'd counsel. Can be all of nothing when they restock every thing shortly but those powders are obtaining transportation regulation difficulties.

Any load data to assist that? My very first thought is it's actually not gonna burn every one of the way and velocities will probably be sluggish and all over the place. May very well be a good fireworks Show!

Nampa, Idaho h4831 vs h4831sc In my knowledge the one authentic change would be that the shortcut meters better via reloading gear. When it's loaded theres no purposeful difference. I have read which the shortcut could possibly have a very small little bit speedier burn off fee but it h4831sc load data seems insignificant.

Like claimed previously mentioned, exact same things. All that differs is the size in the kernels. I did listen to somewhere that they're going to only make the SC Sooner or later. I do not know if that is definitely correct or not but would seem sensible to me. I take advantage of SC simply because that may be what I found in the eight lb jug and it works.

You might both: one) Continue and have the firearm(s) detailed underneath automatically removed from your searching cart:

It is amusing how over the years loading innumerable distinct cartridges in many different rifles that I haven't obtained appropriate stop results with H-4831 or even the quick-Slash Edition.

That is an more mature thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an outdated thread. You should consider developing a new thread.

Like All people said, the SC means “quick Slash” and is particularly a little bit simpler to meter. Can make you problem why they might still make the normal 1.

Southwest Idaho I tried H4831sc in my three hundred WM but had much better velocity and accuracy with H1000. I'd alternatively make use of a slower burning powder with 215g capsules.

Obviously, sitting close to for twenty+ yrs (I know a guy who is still using the H4831 he bought inside the 60s), implies that burn off premiums will most likely improve a smidge, h4831sc and new manufacture things will likely be slightly different as well.

Report this page